The End of Missed Court History in SIU Investigations
Initial Findings turns public court record review into a repeatable, defensible workflow – then keeps it current so you’re not surprised later.
2-minute fit check → short survey → founders offered seats
Built with SIU workflows in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Initial SIU Findings Report
Allegheny County, PA
Generated: Feb 01, 2026, 09:04 AM
Sources: Allegheny County public court records
Prior cases
- CP-02-CR-0001234-2021
- GD-21-004321
Open cases
- CP-02-CR-0005678-2024
- MJ-05001-CR-0000123-2020
Known associates
- CP-02-CR-0002222-2020
- GD-20-009876
Court history isn’t a “first day” task
SIU investigations break down when court history is inconsistent, undocumented, or too slow to refresh.
Initial Findings turns the work into a repeatable workflow: collect, cite, review, and monitor—so your team stops rebuilding the process every time.
Where teams get burned
- One-off searches with no traceable citations
- Common-name collisions that waste analyst time
- Missed updates after the initial check
- Inconsistent writeups across investigators
The failure mode is process, not effort.
How it works
A conservative workflow that favors clarity, citations, and review – not black-box scoring.
- Standardized identity resolution and name permutations
- Prior and open cases summarized with links you can open
- Conservative associate identification (review-first)
- Monitoring for changes you can actually act on
-
Enter subject details
Name, DOB, address, employer (if available).
-
Generate report
Prior cases, open cases, dispositions, citations.
-
Review and validate
Ambiguous matches labeled clearly.
-
Monitor for change
Notified when relevant updates occur.
Conservative by design. Review-first. No scoring.
Three secrets that make this usable in the real world
Secret #1
Citations everywhere
If you can’t click a source, it doesn’t count. Every summary ties back to a record you can open.
Secret #2
Conservative identity matching
Common names are handled with review-first workflows and clear “why this match” context.
Secret #3
Monitoring that respects scope
Monitoring is explicit: what changes, where, and why it matters—no vague alerts.
Build the Standard With Us
- Early access to workflow and reporting
- Shape reports to match real SIU expectations
- Lock in founding pricing (seats)
- Priority support and faster iteration
This isn’t a demo waitlist. It’s a working group.
Founding Cohort
Limited to 10 teams
What you’ll do
- • Share your workflow constraints
- • Review reports and give feedback
What you get
- • Founding access + onboarding
- • Monitoring + reporting improvements prioritized
Founding Cohort Access
Request founding access
Initial Findings is onboarding a small number of SIU teams to shape the product around real investigation workflows.
To keep this focused, we ask a short fit-check survey before offering founding access.
- ~2 minutes to complete
- Focused on real SIU workflows
- No sales call required
- No obligation if it’s not a fit
We review every submission personally.
What happens next
- Complete a short fit-check survey
- We review for workflow and scope fit
- Selected teams receive founding access details
Limited to 10 founding teams · Allegheny County focus
This is for
- SIU teams who need repeatable, auditable court-history workflows
- Managers who want consistent writeups and reviewable citations
- Investigations where monitoring matters after day one
This is not for
- Risk scoring or “prediction” tools
- Fully automated decisions with no human review
- High-volume consumer background checks
FAQ
What public data sources are included?
Founding scope focuses on court records where citations can be provided. Exact coverage will be listed per county/state as we expand.
How do you handle name collisions and common names?
We use conservative matching and make ambiguity explicit, with clear context for analyst review rather than pretending certainty.
Does this replace background checks?
No. It standardizes court-history investigation workflows and reporting; it does not replace your compliance process.
Does this produce risk scores or predictions?
No. There is no predictive scoring. The goal is auditable summaries with citations.
What does monitoring mean?
Monitoring tracks defined changes in the agreed scope and surfaces updates as reviewable items, not vague alerts.
When will founding members get access?
Founding members get early access in phased releases; we’ll confirm timing after an initial workflow fit check.
Stop Relying on Fragile First-Day Checks
Build an SIU workflow that’s consistent, citable, and monitorable.